I woke up this morning and my heart sank. I read on Twitter
that TCU’s quarterback and Heisman trophy contender Trevone Boykin was arrested
last night for a felony assault on a public servant, resisting arrest, and
public intoxication. Tomorrow he was to
play in the Alamo Bowl against Oregon in San Antonio. As a criminal defense lawyer the thoughts
that immediately come to mind are: he would have to possess intent to strike
the officer or it be knowing (report stating it is unknown who he intended to strike) or it be reckless (bar fight scenario not quite adding up to careless behavior intended to put the unintended in harm's way),
intoxication is a defense to the felony assault if he was so inebriated he did
not have the requisite mental state to form intent, and mostly- how it fits into
the typical scenario of cops choosing to score an arrest versus looking at the
bigger picture. What is that overall big picture ? Well, for starters Boykin
did not start the fight, he merely responded to unwelcome and unseemly
heckling. When two people agree to fight
it is legally called the defense of mutual combat. Much like yelling "fire" in a
crowded movie theater, words do create actions. It is preposterous to think
that the hecklers were throwing jabs as a friendly gesture. The reports
have yet to reveal the “fighting words”
that brought forth Boykin’s reaction. Sure, when cooler and sober heads
prevail, in hindsight it is always
crystal clear that the best thing to do is walk away; however, consider for a moment what would happen if
a heckler called a man’s wife or daughter the ultimate explitive as they walked
by in a continued taunting fashion ? Consider if the heckler were to do such
while walking towards the man/wife or daughter scenario. With or without
alcohol, in the Lone Star State it would not be surprising to see the heckler met
with a physical response to his invitation. Trevone Boykin is a young,
testosterone filled 22 year old. His
frontal lobe for executive decision making capacity won’t fully develop for another three
years. The fact is he responded. Would
everyone ? No. Would most ? That is a hard question not knowing the exact words
and physical behavior of the taunters.
From a moral perspective, did the hecklers receive unjust action ?
No, they knowingly asked for a fight . Is this something in the grand scheme of
things the police considered ? No, I am not aware of any citations to any of
the unruly bullies who started it all. So, here comes the police and one of
them gets punched in the face by Boykin. Bad, of course. The real question is – did Boykin knowingly
and intentionally punch the police officer. Nope. When a police report (which
rarely includes exculpatory evidence) cites 'it is unknown' if Boykin knew who he
was striking at this is a problem. This is clear cut evidence of a melee gone wild with multiple
actors. You don’t arrest someone when it is unknown. Legally, you are required to have probable cause. So,
one might ask did the police do this because of Boykin’s notoriety ? I assert
no, but I am sure it did not hurt. Many rookie cops come at these situations from
the angle that their summoned presence means someone must “pay” for the fight by getting
arrested. Not that I advocate assault in any way, no one does, but too many
times in my career I have represented
the wronged party merely because the instigator lost the fight and was more convincing in their pleas to the police. I currently represent a tiny girl whom
the police arrested because she and her boyfriend (who tried to stop a fight
their cousin got into) were the only ones left for the bouncer to point to by
the time the police arrived. Justice ? No. A good day’s work for the cops
called out, yes- in their mind.
As for the resisting arrest and public intoxication, those
are misdemeanor matters to be investigated and thoroughly vented before
appropriate legal action is to be taken by Boykin, but actions that won’t ruin
his life. Gone are the days in which a cop breaks up a fight and sends the real
life lesson by scaring the instigators with a stern warning or appropriate
citation. My heart goes out for
Trevone. Sure, he should have remained in bed at midnight per
team rules. Sure, I’m sure no TCU fan
wanted him out drinking to the wee hours of the morning days before a Bowl game. But
let’s put it in perspective, he is a hard working kid, like many who made some
bad choices. Should his actions amount
to a felony arrest and possible crushing of his life dreams ? No. TCU Coach Gary Patterson apologized to
the city of San Antonio. If the hecklers were from San Antonio, I say the
apology is unwarranted. I'm sure the rest of the city would agree. Not exactly a welcoming environment to a football team
whose fans are bringing a lot of money to their city. Of course an apology to the injured officer performing his duties and who happened to receive the brunt of an uncalled for drunken melee is quite in order. Let’s hope that lady justice takes off her
blindfold and sees this for what it is.
Oh, and yes all this from a die hard Baylor Bear alum.
6 comments:
Thank you so much for this...bless you for your insight and the great grace bestowed by a Baylor alum.
Yáhoos,they were, Mimi! Boykin's a class act. But once you get out of that arena, your survival instincts take over. Boykin knows the only way to take care of yáhoos! He needs another stripe on his sleeve!
As a TCU fan, let me thank you for your post. You've given all of us alot to think about.
Thanks for your perspective Mimi. This coming from a lawyer and Baylor fan no less says that there should be more pause given to the situation. Thanks from a TCU alum. #GoFrogs
Well done! We all deserve quality representation! You are a positive light in the legal world! Thank you Mimi!
Vert week said,
Post a Comment